The state legislature of Alabama has introduced HB 360 which would amend a previous act regarding abortion with new conditions and new terms. First it adds a phrase to the definition of abortion which is a prelude to the Personhood bill (SB 205) that is expected to come up this session.
“Abortion: The use or prescription of any instrument, medicine, drug, or any other substance or device with the intent to kill the unborn child of a woman known to be pregnant or with the intent to prematurely terminate the pregnancy of a woman known to be pregnant.” (Underlined is new wording in the Act).
This new language sets the stage for a declaration of Personhood to a fertilized ovum by explicitly declaring abortion is murder. It is intentionally offensive to those who do not share these religious beliefs.
There is a new requirement in “§26-23A-4 (9) The abortion provider who is to perform or induce the abortion, a certified technician, or another agent of the abortion provider shall make the embryonic or fetal heartbeat of the unborn child audible for the pregnant woman to hear the heartbeat as described in Section 3 of the act adding this amendatory language. (underlined is new wording in the Act). How this is done for the woman who is deaf, I do not know, but it would be the abortion provider who is required to make it so or be subject to fines.
But this is not even the crux of this bill as the most heinous and unscrupulous section of this bill is the following:
This statement is blatantly false. There is no evidence that abortions result in greater risk for cancer–it has been proven there is no causative link between the two. Dr Jen Gunter covers in her blog the scientific research that proves that there is no link between the two. Here is a quote from her article summarizing the newest study:
A new study confirms this data, that there is no link between abortion and breast cancer. The data come from a study of over 25,000 Danish women from the Diet, Cancer, and Health study. The women completed questionnaires and then were followed for an average of 12 years. This kind of study is probably the best way to look at two common and emotional charged occurrences, like abortion and breast cancer, because there is no recall bias. When something bad happens it is human nature to look back and try to assign causality, but collecting the data prospectively removes this element. The study was also well-powered to detect even a small increase, so another plus.
For Alabama legislators to codify such blatant lies into law is unethical and immoral. It is placing the women of our state at great risk because if their physician lies to them about this information, what else is the physician willing to lie about? I do not expect our legislators to be well versed on every subject but I do expect them to know how to read scientific journals and able to discern between real science and the garbage the religious right calls science.
The religious right calls it science when they believe something to be true and then seek evidence to validate their belief. That is not science that is magical thinking. They interview women who have had breast cancer and then ask them if they ever had an abortion. They do not even consider this fact about spontaneous abortions:
Around half of all fertilized eggs die and are lost (aborted) spontaneously, usually before the woman knows she is pregnant. Among women who know they are pregnant, the miscarriage rate is about 15-20%. Most miscarriages occur during the first 7 weeks of pregnancy.
This fact reveals the nonsensical element of their finding alleged causative links. There are lots of factors that lead a person to develop cancer but abortions (spontaneous or intended) have been ruled as not being one of them. Our legislators need to put their religious beliefs aside and reconsider the impact this legislation will have on a state already tarnished as being uneducated.
Requiring physicians to betray their professional ethics and standards by codifying lies into law is harmful to all of Alabama. This bill needs to be defeated not only for the reasons that it attacks a woman’s right to choose but mainly because it is simply bad legislation. Period.